Blog

13 November, 2025

How ManCos solve the cross-border structuring challenge

Mountain Ranges closeup view with snow and sky

Cross-border fundraising can require coordinated fund structures, regulatory permissions, governance and multiple service providers. Third-party ManCos can help managers manage this complexity by providing regulatory infrastructure, operational coordination and ongoing oversight. Apex Group's ManCo capabilities are positioned to support managers operating across European jurisdictions and investor markets.

Master-feeder arrangements, parallel funds, and passport complications have made European fund distribution increasingly complex. For many managers, the operational demands of running multi-jurisdictional structures exceed what internal teams can sustain. Third-party management companies (“ManCos”) provide the infrastructure, expertise, and governance that transform complexity into a manageable process.

Managers with global ambitions face diverse investor expectations. European institutions often insist on Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (“UCITS”) or Alternative Investment Funds (“AIFs”).

Theoretically, the solution is simple: establish multiple funds tailored to each investor base. In practice, this creates overlapping compliance obligations, inconsistent reporting, and coordination challenges across regulators and service providers.

Luxembourg and Ireland as hubs

Luxembourg and Ireland together account for more than 80% of European Union cross-border fund assets. Their appeal lies in robust regulatory frameworks, global reputations, and established ecosystems of service providers. Yet even in these markets, structuring cross-border funds requires specialist capabilities that many managers underestimate.

ManCos based in these hubs provide substance, regulatory authorisation, and operational coordination that make complex structures viable.

Where complexity multiplies

Managing a master-feeder structure involves local laws, Luxembourg regulation, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) requirements, United States securities rules, and treaty-based tax considerations. Adding a Gulf feeder brings additional local regulatory and substance considerations. Without specialist oversight, this complexity can overwhelm managers and increase regulatory risk.

UCITS: opportunity and challenge

UCITS funds remain the gold standard of global distribution. Irish-domiciled UCITS are registered in more than 90 countries, capturing around 36% of the cross-border fund market. The reach is significant, but the compliance obligations are equally demanding.

UCITS require daily monitoring of diversification limits, liquidity testing, risk management systems that meet European Union standards, and adherence to Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) marketing rules. Many managers underestimate these requirements until they are already in market.

This brings additional considerations in provider selection. Understanding the different service models and levels of oversight is key to choosing a ManCo or AIFM that matches your client service expectations and can support growth across jurisdictions, investor bases, and asset classes. Selecting the right partner is a critical step in building a successful global distribution model.

Service provider coordination

Cross-border funds typically rely on administrators, custodians, legal counsel, and tax specialists across several jurisdictions. Each uses different systems and reporting processes. Aligning these outputs into a coherent framework is time-consuming and costly.

ManCos streamline this by coordinating service providers, enforcing consistent standards, and maintaining relationships with regulators and auditors.

Regulatory change and hidden costs

European regulation continues to develop, from AIFMD II to Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (“SFDR”) updates and MiFID II changes. These shifts affect structures across multiple jurisdictions and require coordinated implementation. Internal teams often lack the capacity to track and integrate such changes while managing ongoing operations.

Costs also multiply in hidden ways: duplicate audits, duplicated due diligence, parallel tax filings, and inefficiencies in reconciliation across jurisdictions. Poorly leveraged structures can consume 40- 60% more resources than necessary.

The ManCo advantage

Third-party ManCos provide:

  • Proven expertise in designing and managing cross-border structures

  • Integrated compliance frameworks spanning AIFMD, UCITS, SFDR, and MiFID II

  • Established service provider networks with harmonised processes

  • Continuous regulatory monitoring across jurisdictions

  • Scalable infrastructure supporting multiple fund types and investor bases

By leveraging these capabilities, managers can focus on investment performance and fundraising rather than navigating regulatory and operational complexity.

Building competitive advantage

Cross-border structuring is no longer optional for managers with international investors. The choice is whether to spend years and significant resources developing in-house capabilities, or to partner with ManCos that have already built the expertise and infrastructure.

For detailed guidance on master-feeder structures, parallel arrangements, and integrated approaches to cross-border fund distribution, download our guide, European fund strategies: ManCo solution for structuring and managing European funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cross-border structures can involve multiple fund vehicles, investor requirements, regulators, service providers and reporting regimes. Master-feeder structures, parallel funds and different distribution requirements can increase operational and compliance complexity.

A third-party ManCo can provide regulatory infrastructure, governance, operational coordination and ongoing oversight across jurisdictions. It can also help coordinate administrators, custodians, legal advisers and other providers.

Managers should assess the ManCo's regulatory authorisations, jurisdictional coverage, experience with UCITS and AIF structures, governance capabilities, service-provider network, regulatory monitoring and ability to support the manager's target investor markets.

A well-designed structure can make a fund easier to distribute to target investors while aligning the vehicle with local regulatory and operational requirements. The structure should be selected based on the manager's strategy, investor base, jurisdictions and distribution plans.

Link copied to clipboard

See more of our insights in Google Search

Add as a preferred source on Google